SKILLEMALL.ai

AC skylight-mcp

Read and manage your Skylight Calendar family hub — calendar events, chores and reward stars, shared lists (grocery/to-do), and meal plans. Triggers on phrases like "check Skylight", "what's on the family calendar", "add an event to Skylight", "what chores does [kid] have", "mark [chore] done", "add milk to the grocery list", "what's on our shopping list", "what's for dinner", "what's on the meal plan", "who's on the Skylight frame", or any request involving the Skylight frame, family calendar, chores, rewards, shared lists, or meals. Works against your own signed-in Skylight account via email + password.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: chrischall v0.10.1 MIT-0 2 files body ≈ 1 113 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

Read and manage your Skylight Calendar family hub — calendar events, chores and reward stars, shared lists (grocery/to-do), and meal plans.

As a process C 59/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches

ProcedurePersonal productivityAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
91/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
77
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
59/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 59/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Steps. 6 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1113 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +5Description quotes 10 example trigger phrases
  • +3Description length 612: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 5 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 6 items
  • +4Has examples (1 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 77.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This Skylight connector is purpose-aligned, but it asks users to run an unpinned third-party MCP package with reusable account credentials and exposes broad private family-data read/write capabilities.
LLM: suspicious (high) · 10 Sept 2026