SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AC wechat-read

Read chat history from a WeChat contact or group via macOS desktop client screenshot + agent OCR. Use when the user asks to read, view, check, or retrieve WeChat chat messages, conversation history, or recent messages from a contact or group. v2.0 auto mode tries fast locate + verify first; falls back to Agent-assisted mode only when verification fails. Requires macOS, WeChat desktop logged in, Accessibility permission, and cliclick. NOT for sending messages (use wechat-send).

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Lnation v2.2.0 MIT-0 6 files · 3 scripts body ≈ 1 316 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 3 d ago

As a process C 58/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches

AnalyzerAI and agentsInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
94/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
85
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
58/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 6. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 58/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (wechat-read) differs from the folder (wechat-read-cn)
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 32 steps
    • 100When it triggers. States when to use and when not to
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1316 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • -32 of 3 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
    • +3Description length 481: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 23 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 32 items
    • +4Has examples (10 code blocks)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 85.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    This skill appears purpose-built for reading WeChat chats, but it needs Review because it captures private conversations and leaves sensitive local artifacts behind.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026