SKILLEMALL.ai

AC nextsteps

Append context-aware next-step suggestions after agent responses. Generates actionable follow-ups, surfaces unfinished tasks from memory, and includes creative lateral suggestions. Self-learns user preferences for count, categories, and format. Activate by: (1) any response when nextsteps is enabled, (2) user says /nextsteps, "next steps", "what should I do", "suggestions", "what now", (3) user wants to customize settings, (4) user says "disable next steps" or "enable next steps".

ClawHub Agent Skills author: cindulasai v1.0.1 MIT-0 12 files body ≈ 2 011 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process C 62/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

GeneratorAI and agentsInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
97/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
99
Quality 40%
93
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
62/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
When it triggers w 12
20
Inputs and preconditions w 11
30
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 1

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Medium and low: 1
    • low Dangerous commands cmd-privilege references/SECURITY.md:33
      Privilege escalation / world-writable permissions (negated — the text forbids it)
      - File permissions that are world-writable (e.g., `chmod 777`)
      negated

    Files scanned: 12. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 62/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 30Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 100Steps. 35 steps
    • 100Failures and branches. 10 branches, has a failure section
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2011 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
    • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
    • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
    • low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +5Description quotes 6 example trigger phrases
    • +3Description length 485: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 17 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 35 items
    • +4Has examples (2 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (6 of 6)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 93.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    This skill is a local next-step suggestion helper, but it persistently records inferred preferences, history, and backlog items with weak user control, including passive backlog tracking after disablement.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026