CD TIA_HW_AUDITOR
Use TIA Openness to compare hardware and I/O configuration between field and master backups.
Use TIA Openness to compare hardware and I/O configuration between field and master backups.
As a process D 49/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
ProcedureData and analyticsAI and agentsWriting and documentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
How to improve
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
name-formatname should be kebab-case (lowercase letters, digits, hyphens) - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "tools"
Process rating: all ten parameters 49/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (TIA_HW_AUDITOR) differs from the folder (tia-hw-auditor)
- 100Tools and files. Tools declared in frontmatter
- 100Steps. 8 steps
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 124 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Description length 92: 120–800 characters recommended
- +4Structure: 0 headings, hard to scan
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +4No input/output examples
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 8 items
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 67.
External checks
ClawHub: suspicious
This skill appears intended for legitimate TIA hardware auditing, but it would access engineering network shares and run an external audit script without enough scoping or user-control details.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 16 Sept 2026