SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AC project-bootstrap

Bootstrap a multi-agent software project from idea to running CI/CD. Use when starting a new project that needs agent team design, task management, GitHub repo setup, TDD pipeline, and Discord notifications. Triggers on "new project", "bootstrap project", "set up agents for project", "create project pipeline", "start a new repo with CI/CD".

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Bingji Guo v1.0.0 MIT-0 5 files body ≈ 1 223 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 3 d ago

As a process C 62/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, running it twice

GeneratorDiscordGitHubInfrastructureAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
95/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
99
Quality 40%
90
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
62/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 1

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Medium and low: 1
    • low Exfiltration exfil-webhook-url references/ci-cd-templates.md:127
      Webhook / callback URL commonly used for exfiltration (verify the destination) (placeholder value)
      - Payload URL: `https://discord.com/api/webhooks/<id>/<token>/github`
      placeholder

    Files scanned: 5. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 62/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 30Running it twice. 11 mutating operations with no state check
    • 55Failures and branches. 1 branches
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 30 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1223 tokens

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • -31 of 1 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +5Description quotes 5 example trigger phrases
    • +3Description length 342: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 17 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 30 items
    • +4Has examples (7 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (2 of 2)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 90.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    This project setup skill is not obviously malicious, but it asks agents to create persistent project automation and change GitHub/Discord infrastructure without enough guardrails.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026