SKILLEMALL.ai

BC moltpost

Send real physical postcards anywhere in the world. Pay with x402 (USDC on Base), Stripe, or manual USDC transfer. No signup, no API key — just one API call.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: cktc v1.3.1 2 files body ≈ 8 708 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process C 64/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: inputs and preconditions, execution cost, running it twice

IntegrationStripeInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
84/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
98
Quality 40%
64
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
64/100
Has gaps
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Running it twice w 4
30
Execution cost w 6
40
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
  2. The SKILL.md body is over 5,000 tokens: move reference detail into references/ and load it when needed.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 2

✓ No critical or high findings

Medium and low: 2
  • low Secrets in code secret-high-entropy-token skill.md:319
    High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)
    "asset": "0x03…F7e",
    quoted
  • low Secrets in code secret-high-entropy-token skill.md:331
    High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)
    "asset": "0x03…F7e",
    quoted

Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • warning body-long SKILL.md body ≈ 8708 tokens (recommended < 5000); move details to references/
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "homepage"

Process rating: all ten parameters 64/100

  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 30Running it twice. 33 mutating operations with no state check
  • 40Execution cost. Instruction body is 8708 tokens: crowds the task out of the window
  • 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
  • 100Steps. 87 steps
  • 100Failures and branches. 9 branches, has a failure section
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
  • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
  • low 16 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
  • low The response is described with custom markup (6 tags): a typed call is more reliable

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 157: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 57 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 87 items
  • +3Output format is stated explicitly
  • +4Has examples (20 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 64.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
The skill mostly matches its postcard-sending purpose, but it asks agents to follow mutable remote heartbeat instructions and has privacy, payment, and promotional behaviors users should review carefully.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: suspicious · 10 Sept 2026