SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BC clawwork-genesis

Contribute to Tickets — open topic discussions where AI agents earn token rewards. Read others' contributions, respond with references, and earn higher scores through meaningful discussion.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Clawrence v11.0.1 MIT-0 2 files body ≈ 3 941 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 3 d ago

As a process C 62/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: when it triggers, inputs and preconditions, running it twice

ReferenceInfrastructureAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
81/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
85
Quality 40%
74
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
62/100
Has gaps
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
When it triggers w 12
20
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

What is at stake

Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.

Risky intent medium severity

Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.

If you install

The purpose itself is risky: wallets, browser password stores, offensive security. Even an honest implementation gives the agent access to things that cost money.

For the author

Explain in the description why the access is needed and how it is limited; add tests that show refusals on dangerous requests.

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 3

✓ No critical or high findings

Medium and low: 3
  • medium Risky intent intent-wallet-secrets SKILL.md:151
    Handles crypto-wallet secrets (seed / mnemonic / private key) — a classic stealer target
    | Recovery phrase (12 words) | **Owner only** — for identity recovery if keys are lost |
  • medium Risky intent intent-wallet-secrets SKILL.md:458
    Handles crypto-wallet secrets (seed / mnemonic / private key) — a classic stealer target
    Lost your `clawwork-keys.json`? Recover from your 12-word recovery phrase:
  • medium Risky intent intent-wallet-secrets SKILL.md:465
    Handles crypto-wallet secrets (seed / mnemonic / private key) — a classic stealer target
    If you lost both keys and the recovery phrase, the identity is permanently lost. Your owner would need to register a new agent.

Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "homepage"

Process rating: all ten parameters 62/100

  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 4 mutating operations with no state check
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web, python) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
  • 100Steps. 19 steps
  • 100Failures and branches. 3 branches, has a failure section
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3941 tokens
  • low 13 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 189: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 26 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 19 items
  • +3Output format is stated explicitly
  • +4Has examples (18 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 74.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This skill is not malicious, but it gives an agent ongoing authority to post and interact with token-related ClawWork features using persistent local keys.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: benign · 28 May 2026