BF 第一性原理·决策推演
世界级战略决策推演工具。以第一性原理为锚点，融合三层九问框架（门槛关/优势关/智慧关），对任何候选业务方向、战略动作、新产品线或战略转型进行深度推演。内置事前验尸协议、时机判断框架、心智模型库、退出条件与里程碑设计。触发场景："我们要不要做XX方向""用第一性原理判断这个业务值不值得做""主线/聚焦/克制决策推演""战略推演""选方向"等。这不是一个简单的"做/不做"二选一工具，而是一个逼出盲区、校准决策质量、留下可复盘痕迹的系统。
世界级战略决策推演工具。以第一性原理为锚点，融合三层九问框架（门槛关/优势关/智慧关），对任何候选业务方向、战略动作、新产品线或战略转型进行深度推演。内置事前验尸协议、时机判断框架、心智模型库、退出条件与里程碑设计。触发场景："我们要不要做XX方向""用第一性原理判断这个业务值不值得做""主线/聚焦/克制决策推演""…
As a process F 31/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: references/framework.md, references/premortem-protocol.md, references/timing-framework.md
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
name-formatname should be kebab-case (lowercase letters, digits, hyphens) - warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when") - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/framework.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/premortem-protocol.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/timing-framework.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: assets/wargame-output-template.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: assets/mainline-discovery-worksheet.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: assets/reading-meeting-template.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: scripts/score_wargame.py
Process rating: all ten parameters 31/100
- 0Tools and files. 7 referenced file(s) missing: references/framework.md, references/premortem-protocol.md, references/timing-framework.md
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (第一性原理·决策推演) differs from the folder (first-principles-wargame)
- 100Steps. 48 steps
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 811 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +5Description quotes 4 example trigger phrases
- +3Description length 218: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 17 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 48 items
- +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 60.