SKILLEMALL.ai

BC hr-interview-evaluator

🎯 智能面试评估助手 通过口令触发,自动结合JD文字+简历文档+面试记录文档,生成专业面试评估报告 【触发口令】 面试评估、生成评估报告、候选人评估、面试评价、评估候选人 【使用方式】 1. 发送触发口令(如'面试评估') 2. 粘贴JD文字 3. 上传简历PDF/Word 4. 上传面试记录PDF/Word(可选) 5. 系统自动生成完整评估报告 【输出内容】 💡 智能录用建议 —— ✅建议 / ⚠️条件录用 / ❌不建议 ⭐ 五维星级评分 —— 技术/专业/学习力/匹配度/稳定性 📊 人岗匹配度分析 📄 一键导出 —— PDF/PNG 专业报告 【评估维度】 - 技术能力(25%):核心技能掌握程度 - 专业经验(20%):行业经验和项目匹配度 - 学习能力(20%):成长潜力和适应力 - 岗位匹配(20%):与JD要求契合度 - 稳定性(15%):职业规划连续性

ClawHub Agent Skills author: CIO v1.0.0 MIT-0 2 files body ≈ 1 676 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

AnalyzerInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
88/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
70
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
53/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Steps. 26 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1676 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -222 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 397: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 28 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 26 items
  • +4Has examples (12 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 70.

External checks

ClawHub: clean
This is an instruction-only HR evaluation skill that handles sensitive candidate documents for its stated purpose, with no evidence of hidden code, exfiltration, persistence, or privileged actions.
LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026