SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BF cloudnet-wlan-inspection-lite

Cloudnet WLAN无线网络巡检技能（极简版）。通过mcporter调用Cloudnet MCP接口，执行6步巡检流程： 获取场所信息→AC健康度→问题分布与接入成功率→Cloudnet问题推理→AP上线率→生成巡检报告。 输出中文MD+DOCX双格式巡检报告，标题为"无线网络运维巡检报告（极简版）"。 适用于日常快速健康检查。 触发词：巡检、极简版巡检、WLAN巡检、无线网络巡检、cloudnet巡检。 前置依赖：mcporter CLI + cloudnet MCP服务器配置（API Key认证） + python-docx（DOCX报告用）。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Cloudnet v1.0.1 MIT-0 2 files body ≈ 1 831 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 3 d ago

As a process F 35/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: references/data-format.md

IntegrationWordAI and agentsSoftware developmentInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
86/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
64
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
35/100
Will not run
References files that are not bundled: references/data-format.md
Tools and files w 18
0
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
  2. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: references/data-format.md

Process rating: all ten parameters 35/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: references/data-format.md
  • 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: references/data-format.md
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 100Steps. 19 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1831 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -227 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 280: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 26 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 19 items
  • +4Has examples (24 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 64.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This WLAN inspection skill appears purpose-aligned, but it handles and persists a Cloudnet API credential with too little explicit user control or secret-handling guidance.
LLM: suspicious (high) · 28 May 2026