BF pork-cutting-spec
依据 GB/T 40466-2021 标准提供猪肉分割技术指导，覆盖术语定义、原料要求、分割车间基本要求、分割方式、程序及要求标识、包装、贮存和运输要求；当用户 / 屠宰企业 / 肉企 / 肉制品加工厂需要学习猪肉分割技术、查猪肉分割规范、做猪肉标准化分割时适用
依据 GB/T 40466-2021 标准提供猪肉分割技术指导，覆盖术语定义、原料要求、分割车间基本要求、分割方式、程序及要求标识、包装、贮存和运输要求；当用户 / 屠宰企业 / 肉企 / 肉制品加工厂需要学习猪肉分割技术、查猪肉分割规范、做猪肉标准化分割时适用
As a process F 35/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: references/pork-butcher-procedures.md, references/gbt_9959_1_2019_raw_carcass.md, references/nyt_3383_2020_packaging_labeling.md
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 0. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when") - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/pork-butcher-procedures.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/gbt_9959_1_2019_raw_carcass.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/nyt_3383_2020_packaging_labeling.md - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "display_name"
Process rating: all ten parameters 35/100
- 0Tools and files. 3 referenced file(s) missing: references/pork-butcher-procedures.md, references/gbt_9959_1_2019_raw_carcass.md, references/nyt_3383_2020_packaging_labeling.md
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 100Steps. 36 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 673 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +4No input/output examples
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 131: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 14 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 36 items
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (5 of 5)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 59.