BC labor-fee-calculator
劳动法费用计算路由技能。根据用户问题自动分发到子技能：补偿金/赔偿金计算、加班工资计算、未休年休假补偿计算、工伤赔偿计算。当用户询问离职补偿、加班费、年假折算、工伤赔偿等劳动法相关费用计算时触发。
劳动法费用计算路由技能。根据用户问题自动分发到子技能：补偿金/赔偿金计算、加班工资计算、未休年休假补偿计算、工伤赔偿计算。当用户询问离职补偿、加班费、年假折算、工伤赔偿等劳动法相关费用计算时触发。
As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 4 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 283 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Description length 98: 120–800 characters recommended
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +4No input/output examples
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +4Structure: 8 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 4 items
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 65.
External checks
ClawHub: suspicious
This labor-law calculator is mostly coherent, but it gives its scripts broad local file read/write power and sends API credentials with persistent session metadata in ways users should review before installing.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 1 Jun 2026