AF poyo-gpt-5-4
GPT-5.4 chat completions on PoYo / poyo.ai via `https://api.poyo.ai/v1/chat/completions`; use for `gpt-5.4`, OpenAI-compatible chat payloads, coding help, reasoning, system prompts, multi-turn messages, streaming chat, max_tokens, and server-side chat integration.
GPT-5.4 chat completions on PoYo / poyo.ai via https://api.poyo.ai/v1/chat/completions; use for gpt-5.4, OpenAI-compatible chat payloads, coding help…
As a process F 52/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: references/api.md, scripts/submit_gpt_5_4_chat.sh
How to improve
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 0. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/api.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: scripts/submit_gpt_5_4_chat.sh
Process rating: all ten parameters 52/100
- 0Tools and files. 2 referenced file(s) missing: references/api.md, scripts/submit_gpt_5_4_chat.sh
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
- 60Failures and branches. 2 branches
- 100Steps. 25 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 607 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +4No input/output examples
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 264: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 8 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 25 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 74.