SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AC aso

When the user wants to audit or optimize an App Store or Google Play listing. Also use when the user mentions 'ASO audit,' 'app store optimization,' 'optimize my app listing,' 'improve app visibility,' 'app store ranking,' 'audit my listing,' 'why aren't people downloading my app,' 'improve my app conversion,' 'keyword optimization for app,' or 'compare my app to competitors.' Use when the user shares an App Store or Google Play URL and wants to improve it.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Corey Haines v1.0.0 MIT-0 8 files body ≈ 3 750 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 2 d ago

When the user wants to audit or optimize an App Store or Google Play listing.

As a process C 56/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, running it twice

AnalyzerData and analyticsMarketingtype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
95/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
88
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
56/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 7. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 56/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 65Failures and branches. 3 branches
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 100Steps. 121 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3750 tokens
    • low 11 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
    • low No test case covers injection arriving through data

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 461: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 23 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 121 items
    • +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (5 of 5)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 88.

    External checks

    ClawHub: clean
    This skill provides a coherent app-store-listing audit workflow and does not show hidden, destructive, or credential-seeking behavior.
    LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 30 Jul 2026