SKILLEMALL.ai

AC backtest-analyzer

回测分析工具。从交易记录CSV计算回测核心指标: 胜率、盈亏比、最大回撤、夏普比率、获利因子、 最佳/最差单笔交易。支持JSON报告导出。 Use when: 需要评估交易策略表现、分析回测结果、 计算策略风险指标、对比不同策略。 🎉 v1.0.0 指标: - 总交易数 / 盈利交易 / 亏损交易 - 胜率 / 盈亏比 / 获利因子 - 总收益率 / 平均每笔收益 - 最大回撤 / 夏普比率 - 最佳/最差单笔交易 触发关键词:回测分析、策略评估、量化交易、交易统计 适用范围:CSV 交易记录 运行模式:纯本地

ClawHub Agent Skills author: ChengQian v1.0.0 MIT-0 7 files body ≈ 357 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 2 d ago

回测分析工具。从交易记录CSV计算回测核心指标: 胜率、盈亏比、最大回撤、夏普比率、获利因子、 最佳/最差单笔交易。支持JSON报告导出。 Use when: 需要评估交易策略表现、分析回测结果、 计算策略风险指标、对比不同策略。 🎉 v1.0.0 指标: - 总交易数 / 盈利交易 / 亏损交易 - 胜率 /…

As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

AnalyzerData and analyticstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
95/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
87
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
53/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 0. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 6 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 357 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
    • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 262: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 8 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 6 items
    • +4Has examples (3 code blocks)
    • +3All 1 scripts are documented

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 87.

    External checks

    ClawHub: clean
    This is a local backtest CSV analyzer with some under-documented optional analyses, but no evidence of network access, credential use, hidden persistence, or destructive behavior.
    LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 19 Jul 2026