AC trade-tracker
交易追踪与归因分析 v1.1.0。从交易记录逐笔追踪盈亏、 按股票/月度/季度/年度归因、交易成本分析(佣金+滑点)、 持仓时间分析、策略标签归类、多策略对比、ASCII盈亏分布图。 Use when: 需要复盘交易记录、归因分析、 查看按股票/时间段的盈亏分布、成本分析、持仓结构。 🎉 v1.1.0 新增: - 月度/季度/年度归因分解(--by month/quarter/year) - 交易成本分析(--cost: 佣金占比、滑点估算) - 持仓时间分析(--hold: 平均持仓天数、区间分组) - 策略标签归类(--tag: 按策略标签汇总) - 多策略/多时段对比(--compare) - ASCII盈亏分布图(--chart: K线图风格) - 自动识别更多日期格式 触发关键词：交易复盘、归因分析、交易统计、投资收益、持仓分析 适用范围：CSV 交易记录(含盈亏、日期列) 运行模式：纯本地
交易追踪与归因分析 v1.1.0。从交易记录逐笔追踪盈亏、 按股票/月度/季度/年度归因、交易成本分析(佣金+滑点)、 持仓时间分析、策略标签归类、多策略对比、ASCII盈亏分布图。 Use when: 需要复盘交易记录、归因分析、 查看按股票/时间段的盈亏分布、成本分析、持仓结构。 🎉 v1.1.0 新增: -…
As a process C 50/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 7. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 50/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 75Steps. 3 steps
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 566 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 410: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 7 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 3 items
- +4Has examples (2 code blocks)
- +3All 1 scripts are documented
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 87.