BC linguistic-landscape-analyzer
语言景观分析 MCP 工具 - 小红书情感分析与关键词提取,支持语言学/社会学研究
As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 5
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 5
-
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenpackage-lock.json:73High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)"integrity": "sha5…GLi+2W/6ao+6Y7gu/RCwR…Kng==",
quoted -
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenpackage-lock.json:252High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (detector / deny-list definition)"integrity": "sha5…GLw+xYSd…cqA==",
detector -
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenpackage-lock.json:307High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)"integrity": "sha5…FrF+LTRo…W3g==",
quoted -
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenpackage-lock.json:316High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)"integrity": "sha5…A6j+hAmM…GbS+kf5c…csw==",
quoted -
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenpackage-lock.json:325High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)"integrity": "sha5…5bm+c2gQ…aG5+esrLODihIorn+Pe6F…dXA==",
quoted
Files scanned: 10. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when") - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "homepage"
Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 51 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 967 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
- low 11 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Description length 41: 120–800 characters recommended
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -219 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +4Structure: 29 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 51 items
- +4Has examples (8 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 66.
External checks
ClawHub: clean
This is a local text-analysis skill that reads CSV files from its own data folder and writes reports to its own reports folder, with some documentation and parameter mismatches but no evidence of hidden exfiltration or destructive behavior.
LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026