SKILLEMALL.ai

BC query-rewrite

📥 openclaw skill install dabin0927/query-rewrite —— RAG 检索命中率低?不是模型不行,是用户不会提问。 在检索前加一层 Query 改写——检测、改写、原文+改写结果都搜一遍。 6 种模式:指代消解、多意图拆解、上下文补齐、反问识别…… 实测召回率提升 60%,配合 raglite 使用效果最佳。 适合:RAG 检索前、memory_search/wiki_search 调用前。 不适合:代码生成、文件操作、单次精确查询。 (EN) RAG pre-processing query rewrite layer — 6 rewrite modes.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: DaBin0927 v1.0.4 MIT-0 4 files body ≈ 937 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 2 d ago

📥 openclaw skill install dabin0927/query-rewrite —— RAG 检索命中率低?不是模型不行,是用户不会提问。 在检索前加一层 Query 改写——检测、改写、原文+改写结果都搜一遍。 6 种模式:指代消解、多意图拆解、上下文补齐、反问识别…… 实测召回率提升…

As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
89/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
73
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
53/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "triggers"

Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Steps. 17 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 937 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
  • low 11 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -227 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 304: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 16 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 17 items
  • +4Has examples (5 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 73.

External checks

ClawHub: clean
This skill only provides disclosed query-rewriting guidance for better RAG/search retrieval and does not include executable code or hidden system access.
LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 3 Aug 2026