SKILLEMALL.ai

AC git-backed-obsidian-cli-workflows

Use the official Obsidian CLI for note workflows in a Git-backed vault, including search, read, links/backlinks-style queries, daily-note operations, and lightweight note writes that auto-sync after successful write operations. Use when the official Obsidian CLI is already installed and usable on any supported environment, and the task is about querying or updating notes in an Obsidian vault with Git-backed backup behavior.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Darin Lo v1.0.0 MIT-0 8 files · 2 scripts body ≈ 848 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 5 d ago

Use the official Obsidian CLI for note workflows in a Git-backed vault, including search, read, links/backlinks-style queries, daily-note operations, and…

As a process C 59/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, running it twice

ProcedureObsidianSoftware developmenttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
96/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
91
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
59/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 8. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 59/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 30Running it twice. 6 mutating operations with no state check
    • 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 32 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 848 tokens

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 427: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 10 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 32 items
    • +4Has examples (2 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (4 of 4)
    • +3All 2 scripts are documented

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 91.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    This note workflow skill is not clearly malicious, but it needs review because it can write outside the intended vault and automatically push more files than the user likely intended.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 11 Sept 2026