SKILLEMALL.ai

CD soul-guardian

Drift detection + baseline integrity guard for agent workspace files with automatic alerting support

ClawHub Agent Skills author: davida-ps v0.0.9 MIT-0 10 files body ≈ 1 845 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 2 d ago

Drift detection + baseline integrity guard for agent workspace files with automatic alerting support

As a process D 43/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

AnalyzerInfrastructureAI and agentsSecuritytype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
C
71/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
75
Quality 40%
64
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
43/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
When it triggers w 12
20
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten
This is a copy of a skill from another catalog; the rating counts the canonical one: soul-guardian (ClawHub)

What is at stake

Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.

Dangerous commands medium severity

Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.

If you install

The skill contains commands that delete files, rewrite disks or execute code fetched from the network. The agent may run them without asking if it believes the instructions require it.

For the author

Replace destructive commands with safe equivalents that ask for confirmation, scope them to one folder, and stop piping curl into a shell: pin a version and a checksum.

Exfiltration medium severity

Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.

If you install

The instructions or scripts send data out: environment variables, keys, file contents, chat history. You may never notice, because the agent performs the upload as "part of the task".

For the author

If the upload is not needed for the task, remove it: catalogs flag such skills and delist them. If it is needed, name the destination explicitly, say what leaves the machine, and give the user a switch.

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 5

✓ No critical or high findings

Medium and low: 5
  • medium Dangerous commands cmd-persistence scripts/install_launchd_plist.py:140
    Persistence mechanism (cron / launchd / scheduled task / autorun registry) (string literal in code, not executed)
    help="Write plist to this path (default: ~/Library/LaunchAgents/<label>.plist)",
    code literal
  • medium Dangerous commands cmd-persistence scripts/install_launchd_plist.py:241
    Persistence mechanism (cron / launchd / scheduled task / autorun registry) (string literal in code, not executed)
    sys.stderr.write(f"  launchctl bootstrap gui/{uid} {plist_path}\n")
    code literal
  • medium Dangerous commands cmd-persistence scripts/install_launchd_plist.py:246
    Persistence mechanism (cron / launchd / scheduled task / autorun registry) (string literal in code, not executed)
    print("Installed + started (launchctl bootstrap/enable/kickstart).")
    code literal
  • medium Dangerous commands cmd-persistence scripts/install_launchd_plist.py:249
    Persistence mechanism (cron / launchd / scheduled task / autorun registry) (string literal in code, not executed)
    print(f"  launchctl bootstrap gui/{uid} {plist_path}")
    code literal
  • medium Exfiltration intent-browser-credential-store skill.json:66
    Accesses a browser credential / cookie store (detector / deny-list definition)
    "network_egress": "None by default; soul-guardian operates on local files and local state."
    detector

Files scanned: 10. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "homepage"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "clawdis"

Process rating: all ten parameters 43/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
  • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (soul-guardian) differs from the folder (clawsec-openclaw-soul-guardian)
  • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 85Steps. 23 steps, 1 vague phrases
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1845 tokens
  • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
  • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
  • low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Description length 100: 120–800 characters recommended
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -34 of 5 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +4Structure: 19 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 23 items
  • +4Has examples (12 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 64.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This appears to be a real workspace integrity guard, but it can automatically change files and install a persistent background monitor, so users should review it carefully before installing.
LLM: suspicious (medium) · VirusTotal: · 23 Jun 2026