CC Azure CLI
Comprehensive Azure Cloud Platform management via command-line interface
Comprehensive Azure Cloud Platform management via command-line interface
As a process C 52/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: when it triggers, inputs and preconditions, consistency
What is at stake
The skill contains fragments that, in the wrong hands, cost money or data. Below: what the installer risks and what the author should do.
The skill contains commands that delete files, rewrite disks or execute code fetched from the network. The agent may run them without asking if it believes the instructions require it.
Replace destructive commands with safe equivalents that ask for confirmation, scope them to one folder, and stop piping curl into a shell: pin a version and a checksum.
How to improve
- Address the high-severity findings: each costs 18 safety points. If one is a false positive, add the rule id to guard.allow in spec.yaml.
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 2
-
high Dangerous commands
cmd-pipe-to-shellREADME.md:30Downloads and executes remote code from an unrecognised host (pipe to shell)curl -sL https://aka.ms/InstallAzureCliLinux | bash
-
high Dangerous commands
cmd-pipe-to-shellSKILL.md:56Downloads and executes remote code from an unrecognised host (pipe to shell)curl -sL https://aka.ms/InstallAzureCliLinux | bash
Files scanned: 9. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
name-formatname should be kebab-case (lowercase letters, digits, hyphens) - warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when") - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "repository"
Process rating: all ten parameters 52/100
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 3 mutating operations with no state check
- 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (Azure CLI) differs from the folder (azure-cli)
- 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash) that frontmatter does not declare
- 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
- 100Steps. 33 steps
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2072 tokens
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Description length 72: 120–800 characters recommended
- +2Single-language instructions
- +4Structure: 27 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 33 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
- +4Has examples (26 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
- +3All 5 scripts are documented
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 74.