AF dual-system-thinking
Activate when: a decision feels obvious but the stakes are high; someone says 'I just trust my gut' on a consequential call; a team is converging fast without pushback; you're tired or pressured and still need to decide; you're in an unfamiliar domain moving on instinct. Do NOT activate when: the decision is genuinely routine and low-stakes; you have well-trained calibrated expert intuition in that exact domain and need to act fast. More: deciqai.com/c/dual-system-thinking
Activate when: a decision feels obvious but the stakes are high; someone says 'I just trust my gut' on a consequential call; a team is converging fast without…
As a process F 44/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: examples/kahneman-2011-tversky-kahneman-research.md, examples/llms-as-system-1-ai-era-2024-2026.md, references/sources.md
How to improve
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: examples/kahneman-2011-tversky-kahneman-research.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: examples/llms-as-system-1-ai-era-2024-2026.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/sources.md
Process rating: all ten parameters 44/100
- 0Tools and files. 3 referenced file(s) missing: examples/kahneman-2011-tversky-kahneman-research.md, examples/llms-as-system-1-ai-era-2024-2026.md, references/sources.md
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
- 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
- 85Steps. 16 steps, 2 vague phrases
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1705 tokens
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
- low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
- +3Description length 477: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 11 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 16 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
- +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 79.