AB knowing-and-doing-as-one
Activate when: user says 'I know I should but I haven't', a team is stuck in analysis paralysis going in circles, you need to assess whether someone actually learned from a past experience, a strategy or lessons-learned doc has produced no operational change, or an organization keeps repeating the same mistake. Do NOT activate when: the barrier is a demonstrable external constraint (capital, regulation, waiting for a trigger), or when the goal is to shame rather than diagnose. More: deciqai.com/c/knowing-and-doing-as-one
Activate when: user says 'I know I should but I haven't', a team is stuck in analysis paralysis going in circles, you need to assess whether someone actually…
As a process B 68/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: inputs and preconditions, failures and branches, progress reporting
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 68/100
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
- 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 36 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1915 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 526: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 11 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 36 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
- +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 91.