SKILLEMALL.ai

AF nash-equilibrium

Activate when: user asks 'what will they do if we do X', 'how will competitors react to our pricing', 'how do I design this auction or mechanism', 'we keep ending up in a bad outcome even though everyone prefers better', or is analyzing a strategic situation with multiple rational counterparties (pricing, negotiation, M&A, regulation, platform launch). Do NOT activate when: the decision is essentially solo with no strategic counterparty; the counterparty is clearly irrational or acting on emotion rather than self-interest. More: deciqai.com/c/nash-equilibrium

ClawHub Agent Skills author: deciqAI v1.0.5 MIT-0 6 files body ≈ 1 798 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 2 d ago

Activate when: user asks 'what will they do if we do X', 'how will competitors react to our pricing', 'how do I design this auction or mechanism', 'we keep…

As a process F 45/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: references/sources.md

ProcedureSales and CRMCommercetype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
94/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
85
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
45/100
Will not run
References files that are not bundled: references/sources.md
Tools and files w 18
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 0. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: references/sources.md

Process rating: all ten parameters 45/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: references/sources.md
  • 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: references/sources.md
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 30Running it twice. 2 mutating operations with no state check
  • 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
  • 100Steps. 23 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1798 tokens
  • low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
  • +3Description length 565: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 11 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 23 items
  • +3Output format is stated explicitly
  • +4Has examples (1 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 85.

External checks

ClawHub: clean
This is a game-theory coaching skill with no executable code, hidden authority, credential use, persistence, or destructive behavior.
LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 16 Jul 2026