SKILLEMALL.ai

AF non-zero-sum

Activate when: someone says 'this is win-lose,' 'we can't both win,' 'what's in it for them to cooperate,' 'is there a deal here,' or 'how do we get past this standoff'; a negotiation or conflict feels deadlocked; you're designing a platform, contract, or institution that needs to align competing parties. Do NOT activate when: the resource pool is genuinely fixed and one-shot with no side effects (true zero-sum); the conflict is identity- or values-based with no concrete trade that creates net value. More: deciqai.com/c/non-zero-sum

ClawHub Agent Skills author: deciqAI v1.0.5 MIT-0 5 files body ≈ 2 343 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 2 d ago

Activate when: someone says 'this is win-lose,' 'we can't both win,' 'what's in it for them to cooperate,' 'is there a deal here,' or 'how do we get past this…

As a process F 49/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: references/sources.md

ProcedureSales and CRMtype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
92/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
81
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
49/100
Will not run
References files that are not bundled: references/sources.md
Tools and files w 18
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 0. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: references/sources.md

Process rating: all ten parameters 49/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: references/sources.md
  • 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: references/sources.md
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 2 mutating operations with no state check
  • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
  • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
  • 100Steps. 39 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2343 tokens

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 538: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 11 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 39 items
  • +3Output format is stated explicitly
  • +4Has examples (1 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 81.

External checks

ClawHub: clean
This is a non-executable thinking skill for analyzing cooperative negotiation dynamics, with no evidence of hidden access, persistence, credential use, or unsafe behavior.
LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 17 Jul 2026