AF okr-goal-setting
Activate when: user says 'set OKRs', 'write objectives and key results', 'our goals aren't measurable', 'teams are hitting targets but the business isn't moving', 'we need stretch goals', 'align teams around quarterly goals', or mentions Doerr / Measure What Matters. Do NOT activate when: the team is under ~10 people with informal alignment that works fine; output is genuinely uncertain (deep R&D, research labs) making 'achieve X by Q3' structurally impossible. More: deciqai.com/c/okr-goal-setting
Activate when: user says 'set OKRs', 'write objectives and key results', 'our goals aren't measurable', 'teams are hitting targets but the business isn't…
As a process F 45/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: examples/andy-grove-at-intel-1971-john-doerr-at-google-1999.md, examples/bono-one-campaign-2002-2018.md, examples/ai-native-org-okrs-2024-2026.md
How to improve
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 0. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: examples/andy-grove-at-intel-1971-john-doerr-at-google-1999.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: examples/bono-one-campaign-2002-2018.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: examples/ai-native-org-okrs-2024-2026.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/sources.md
Process rating: all ten parameters 45/100
- 0Tools and files. 4 referenced file(s) missing: examples/andy-grove-at-intel-1971-john-doerr-at-google-1999.md, examples/bono-one-campaign-2002-2018.md, examples/ai-native-org-okrs-2024-2026.md
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 30Running it twice. 3 mutating operations with no state check
- 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
- 100Steps. 18 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1636 tokens
- low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
- +3Description length 502: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 11 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 18 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
- +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 79.