SKILLEMALL.ai

AD lyra-coin-launch-manager

Clawnch coin-launch receipts + local verify: pull launches from clawn.ch, write receipt JSON/MD, optional Blockscout/Dexscreener checks, local bookmark ref files. No git push, no GitHub token load, no repo create. Not for remote wallet control. Read references/SECURITY.md first.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: LYRA Agent - LYGO OS v1.2.0 MIT-0 16 files body ≈ 699 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process D 47/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches

AnalyzerGitHubSoftware developmentInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
94/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
84
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
47/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 16. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 47/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 30Running it twice. 7 mutating operations with no state check
  • 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (git) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 100Steps. 10 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 699 tokens
  • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
  • +3Description length 279: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 13 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 10 items
  • +4Has examples (6 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (2 of 3)
  • +3All 5 scripts are documented
  • +1License stated

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 84.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
The skill mostly matches its stated coin-receipt workflow, but it needs review because some scripts can write outside the advertised local folders when given crafted symbols or paths.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 10 Sept 2026