BC notion-workflows
Notion automations: Create/query/update pages/DBs, templates, summaries. Browser/playwright for UI. Triggers: \"notion db build\", \"notion page create\", \"notion summary\". Examples: Task DB, wiki pages.</description>
As a process C 51/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
ProcedureNotionPlaywrightInfrastructureWriting and documentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
frontmatter-yamlSKILL.md: the frontmatter is not valid YAML (YAML parse error: Nested mappings are not allowed in compact mappings at line 2, column 14: description: Notion automations: Create/query/update pages/DBs, templates, summ… ^ ); fields were read line by line. The usual cause is a colon inside an unquoted value - warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
Process rating: all ten parameters 51/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 85Steps. 7 steps, 1 vague phrases
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 128 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +5Description quotes 3 example trigger phrases
- +3Description length 219: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 3 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 7 items
- +4Has examples (0 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 71.
External checks
ClawHub: clean
This Notion automation skill is coherent and not malicious, but it can view, edit, and export content from the Notion pages or databases you choose to use with it.
LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026