SKILLEMALL.ai

AD gts-operator

GTS 多租户配置平台(表单+审批流)的 AI 原生操作员 skill。让 AI Agent 以纯对话方式完成系统的全部管理操作——注册租户/管理员、维护组织架构与人员、配置表单与工作流(含字段类型/条件分支/审批人规则/子表明细)、发起业务单据、执行审批(同意/驳回/转办/加急)、查询与导出,以及表单复用与模板共享(同租户复制、导出/导入模板包、发布到模板市场、浏览与一键安装、下架)。本 skill 采用「动态发现」模式:Agent 先调用系统自带的 /discovery/routes 与 /discovery/contract 拉取最新 API 契约,再按契约执行操作,因此后端演进时 skill 无需手改。用户只需自然语言下达指令("帮新客户 XX 公司开通租户并搭一个采购审批流程"、"把差旅报销发布成模板")。用于 "用对话完成 XX 配置/审批" "AI 帮我搭表单" "开通租户" "分享/装模板" 等诉求。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Ken Deng v1.0.2 MIT-0 3 files body ≈ 3 175 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 2 d ago

GTS 多租户配置平台(表单+审批流)的 AI 原生操作员 skill。让 AI Agent…

As a process D 43/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

IntegrationAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
91/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
77
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
43/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 43/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 3 mutating operations with no state check
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (node) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 100Steps. 108 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3175 tokens
  • low The response is described with custom markup (12 tags): a typed call is more reliable

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +5Description quotes 5 example trigger phrases
  • +3Description length 414: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 24 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 108 items
  • +4Has examples (6 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 77.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
The skill appears purpose-built for GTS administration, but it persists a 30-day bearer token in a local plaintext file while enabling broad live tenant-management actions.
LLM: suspicious (high) · 10 Sept 2026