SKILLEMALL.ai

AC cosmetic-detect

Analyze facial/body photos to detect signs of cosmetic surgery or aesthetic procedures. Use when the user uploads a photo and asks to identify cosmetic work, detect plastic surgery, assess facial naturalness, check if someone has had work done, analyze before/after photos, or evaluate aesthetic procedure signs. Also trigger when users ask about specific procedures visible in photos (fillers, Botox, rhinoplasty, jaw contouring, etc.), compare photos for surgical changes, or want a "naturalness score" for a face. Works with single images, multiple comparison images, and video screenshots. 触发词:整容检测、看看有没有整、自然度评分、鉴定一下、有没有动过。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Rainman v1.0.0 MIT-0 3 files body ≈ 1 052 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process C 59/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches

AnalyzerInfrastructureMedia and videotype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
95/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
88
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
59/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 59/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 25 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1052 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 627: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 12 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 25 items
    • +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 88.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    This skill does not run code, but it is designed to make sensitive and potentially stigmatizing judgments about people from photos.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026