SKILLEMALL.ai

AB skill-scorer

对任何 SKILL.md(或 skill 文件夹)进行质量评估和打分,基于行业最佳实践,生成 8 维度 100 分制的结构化质检报告,精准定位问题并提供可执行的优化建议。当用户要求评审、审计、评分、检测、质检任何 skill 时使用——哪怕只是说「这个 skill 写得怎么样?」也会触发。也支持:skill质检、skill评分、检测skill。 | Evaluate and score any SKILL.md (or skill folder) against industry best practices. Generates a structured quality report with a 100-point score across 8 dimensions, pinpoints issues, and provides actionable optimization suggestions. Use this skill whenever the user asks to review, audit, evaluate, grade, score, lint, or quality-check a skill — even if they just say 'is this skill any good?' or 'help me improve this skill'. Also triggers on: 'skill review', 'rate my skill'.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: dingtom336-gif v1.0.0 MIT-0 6 files body ≈ 1 528 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 5 d ago

As a process B 71/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: inputs and preconditions, progress reporting

AnalyzerAI and agentsInfrastructureData and analyticstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
94/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
99
Quality 40%
86
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
71/100
Nearly there
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
Tools and files w 18
60
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 1

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Medium and low: 1

    ✓ Guard found no suspicious behaviour. 1 matches are attack strings quoted in this security skill's own documentation.

    Files scanned: 6. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "changelog"

    Process rating: all ten parameters 71/100

    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web, python) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 100Steps. 22 steps
    • 100Failures and branches. 1 branches, has a failure section
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1528 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
    • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +4No input/output examples
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 653: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 12 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 22 items
    • +3Output format is stated explicitly
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (3 of 3)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 86.

    External checks

    ClawHub: clean
    This skill is a disclosed reviewer for SKILL.md files and does not show hidden execution, credential access, persistence, or automatic modification behavior.
    LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026