AC minimalist-review
Review code, a diff, or a PR strictly for bloat: unrequested abstractions, dead scope, dependency creep, symptom-patching, and drive-by changes. Use when the user says "minimalist review", asks "is this over-engineered?", or wants a leanness review of a change.
As a process C 62/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, running it twice
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 62/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
- 55Failures and branches. 1 branches
- 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 6 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 212 tokens
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +4Structure: 1 headings, hard to scan
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +4No input/output examples
- +2Single-language instructions
- +5Description quotes 2 example trigger phrases
- +3Description length 261: enough signal without eating the budget
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 6 items
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 82.