SKILLEMALL.ai

AB agent-cost-strategy

Tiered model selection and cost optimization for multi-agent AI workflows. Use this skill whenever you are choosing a model for a task, spinning up a sub-agent, setting up cron jobs or heartbeats, or trying to reduce API spend. Also use when the user says "save costs", "which model should I use", "optimize model usage", "this is getting expensive", or when delegating any task to a sub-agent. Works with any AI provider.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Deonte Cooper v1.3.6 MIT-0 3 files body ≈ 1 309 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process B 69/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, progress reporting

ProcedureAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
93/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
83
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
69/100
Nearly there
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    • warning frontmatter-yaml SKILL.md: the frontmatter is not valid YAML (YAML parse error: Flow map in block collection must be sufficiently indented and end with a } at line 3, column 110: …:"💰","requires":{"bins":[]},"os":["linux","darwin","win32"],"version":"1.3.6"} ^ ); fields were read line by line. The usual cause is a colon inside an unquoted value

    Process rating: all ten parameters 69/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 55Failures and branches. 1 branches
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 14 steps
    • 100When it triggers. States when to use and when not to
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1309 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
    • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
    • low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +5Description quotes 4 example trigger phrases
    • +3Description length 422: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 11 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 14 items
    • +4Has examples (2 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 83.

    External checks

    ClawHub: clean
    This is a transparent cost-optimization guidance skill with broad activation language, but it contains only markdown instructions and no hidden code or data access.
    LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026