SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AC github-pr-writer

Write clear, structured GitHub pull request descriptions using a standardized template. Use when creating a PR, updating a PR description, or when asked to document what a branch changes. Automatically fills in summary, type of change, description of changes, impact, and testing notes based on the diff or context provided. Triggers on phrases like "create a PR", "write the PR description", "open a pull request", "update the PR body", "document this PR", or when a branch is ready to merge.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Deonte Cooper v1.0.2 MIT-0 3 files body ≈ 833 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 3 d ago

As a process C 60/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, running it twice

GeneratorGitHubSoftware developmentInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
96/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
89
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
60/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 60/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 30Running it twice. 2 mutating operations with no state check
    • 55Failures and branches. 1 branches
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 85Steps. 14 steps, 1 vague phrases
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 833 tokens

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +5Description quotes 5 example trigger phrases
    • +3Description length 493: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 11 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 14 items
    • +4Has examples (3 code blocks)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 89.

    External checks

    ClawHub: clean
    This skill is a small, instruction-only helper for drafting GitHub pull request descriptions and does not show hidden code, persistence, destructive actions, or data exfiltration.
    LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026