SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AD agent-wallet

Manage crypto wallets (Ethereum, Solana, Polygon, Arbitrum, Base) via agent-wallet-cli. Use for checking balances, sending tokens (ETH/SOL/ERC-20/SPL), signing messages, managing approvals, viewing transaction history, x402 payments, and wallet lifecycle (init, unlock, lock, export). Supports HD wallets (BIP-39), session tokens for time-limited access, and JSON output for automation. Open source — https://github.com/donald-jackson/agent-wallet-cli

ClawHub Agent Skills author: donald-jackson v1.4.0 2 files body ≈ 1 782 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 3 d ago

As a process D 43/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

IntegrationGitHubAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
94/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
84
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
43/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
When it triggers w 12
20
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 43/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 30Running it twice. 4 mutating operations with no state check
    • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (agent-wallet) differs from the folder (agent-wallet-cli)
    • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 85Steps. 41 steps, 1 vague phrases
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1782 tokens
    • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
    • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
    • low The response is described with custom markup (3 tags): a typed call is more reliable

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 451: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 17 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 41 items
    • +4Has examples (9 code blocks)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 84.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    This skill is a clearly disclosed crypto-wallet tool, but it gives agents real fund-moving authority and under-discloses outbound HTTP behavior for x402 payments.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: suspicious · 28 May 2026