BF amap-date-spot
约会/见面地点推荐助手。输入一个见面地点或两人位置自动算中点，用高德 POI 搜索周边咖啡馆、小酒馆、公园、书店等适合聊天的场所，智能筛选排除嘈杂场所，输出 3 个不同风格推荐并附理由、约会动线编排、出片建议、停车信息、备选方案。适用于约会、相亲、朋友见面、商务闲聊、纪念日/生日/表白。当用户询问"去哪约会""相亲见面""找个地方聊天""约会推荐"等场景时触发。
约会/见面地点推荐助手。输入一个见面地点或两人位置自动算中点，用高德 POI 搜索周边咖啡馆、小酒馆、公园、书店等适合聊天的场所，智能筛选排除嘈杂场所，输出 3…
As a process F 39/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: uri.amap.com链接, references/text-card-template.md, references/html-template-map.md
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 0. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when") - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: uri.amap.com链接 - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/text-card-template.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/html-template-map.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/invitation-card.html - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/text-card-date-spot.md - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "display_name"
Process rating: all ten parameters 39/100
- 0Tools and files. 5 referenced file(s) missing: uri.amap.com链接, references/text-card-template.md, references/html-template-map.md
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
- 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 4346 tokens
- 100Steps. 66 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
- low 19 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -2101 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 182: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 51 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 66 items
- +4Has examples (15 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 57.