DF auto-research-claw
(no description)
Not recommendedlow grade D
As a process F 29/100 · Will not run — weak spots: steps, result and completion, when it triggers
ReferenceSoftware developmentInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
How to improve
- Add a description to the frontmatter: without it the skill never triggers.
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 5
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 5
-
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokendocs/README_DE.md:93High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential)<tr><td>🔍</td><td><code>verification_report.json</code></td><td>4-Sc…ts- und Relevanzpruefung (arXiv, CrossRef, DataCite, LLM)</td></tr>
-
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokendocs/README_DE.md:313High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential)| **🔍 4-Sc…ion** | arXiv-ID-Pruefung → CrossRef/DataCite-DOI → Semantic-Scholar-Titelabgleich → LLM-Relevanzbewertung. Halluzinierte Refs automatisch entfernt. |
-
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokendocs/showcase/SHOWCASE.md:16High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)<img src="https://img.shields.io/badge/📊_Fig…981?style=…" alt="50 figures">
quoted -
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokendocs/showcase/SHOWCASE.md:17High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)<img src="https://img.shields.io/badge/📑_Out…444?style=…" alt="121 pages">
quoted -
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokendocs/showcase/SHOWCASE.md:582High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)<a href="https://github.com/aiming-lab/AutoResearchClaw"><img src="https://img.shields.io/badge/⭐_Sta…717?style=…&logo=…" alt="GitHub"></a>
quoted
Files scanned: 80. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- error
frontmatterSKILL.md: no YAML frontmatter block found - error
name-missingSKILL.md: frontmatter has no `name` - error
description-missingSKILL.md: no `description` — the skill can never trigger
Process rating: all ten parameters 29/100
- 0Steps. Prose only: no discrete steps
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (python) that frontmatter does not declare
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 162 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Description length 0: 120–800 characters recommended
- +3No numbered steps or checklist
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -425 reference files, but SKILL.md never points to them: the model will not open them
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +4Structure: 4 headings
- +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 0.
External checks
ClawHub: suspicious
This skill is a real autonomous research tool, but it defaults to broad automatic code execution with weak containment in several paths.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 28 May 2026