BD dahua-cloud-open-device-image-analysis
基于大华云开发者平台的 IoT 设备图像分析技能。支持对 Dahua IoT 设备进行抓拍,并调用大模型进行图片分析。可识别监控画面中的人、车辆、物体等,支持安全帽、口罩、烟雾、火焰等检测及摔倒、入侵等行为识别。适用于设备图像分析、安全生产、异常看护、连锁巡检、企业安全管理等场景。
As a process D 46/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
What is at stake
Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.
Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.
The skill contains commands that delete files, rewrite disks or execute code fetched from the network. The agent may run them without asking if it believes the instructions require it.
Replace destructive commands with safe equivalents that ask for confirmation, scope them to one folder, and stop piping curl into a shell: pin a version and a checksum.
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 3
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 3
-
medium Dangerous commands
cmd-shell-rcREADME.md:182Writes to a shell startup fileecho "export DAHUA_CLOUD_PRODUCT_ID='你的 AppID'" >> ~/.bashrc
-
medium Dangerous commands
cmd-shell-rcREADME.md:183Writes to a shell startup fileecho "export DAHUA_CLOUD_AK='你的 AccessKey'" >> ~/.bashrc
-
medium Dangerous commands
cmd-shell-rcREADME.md:184Writes to a shell startup fileecho "export DAHUA_CLOUD_SK='你的 SecretKey'" >> ~/.bashrc
Files scanned: 6. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when") - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "paths"
Process rating: all ten parameters 46/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, python) that frontmatter does not declare
- 100Steps. 27 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2279 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
- low 12 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -219 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 141: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 37 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 27 items
- +4Has examples (21 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 69.