SKILLEMALL.ai

AD chezmoi

chezmoi dotfile management. apply - interactive diff review per file [apply.md], consolidate - merge duplicate templates [consolidate.md], cross-platform - Windows/macOS compatibility [cross-platform.md], doctor - check required files and copy if missing [doctor.md], mcp-sync - MCP server synchronization [mcp-sync.md]. For commit splitting → commit-splitter. Use when "chezmoi apply", "chezmoi diff", "diff review", "per-file apply", "chezmoi consolidate", "duplicate templates", "MCP sync", "chezmoi Windows", "cross platform", "utcp to mcp", "move to global mcp", "chezmoi mcp migration", "chezmoi doctor", "missing script", "SourceGit".

ClawHub Agent Skills author: es6kr v0.4.2 MIT-0 11 files · 1 script body ≈ 654 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process D 40/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

AnalyzerAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
96/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
90
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
40/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 11. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 40/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 30Running it twice. 3 mutating operations with no state check
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 75Steps. 3 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 654 tokens

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +5Description quotes 15 example trigger phrases
    • +3Description length 641: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 10 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 3 items
    • +4Has examples (6 code blocks)
    • +1License stated

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 90.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    This dotfile-management skill is mostly coherent, but it bundles and installs a SourceGit launcher that starts Claude with permission checks disabled.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · 18 Aug 2026