SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BF sf-ai-agentscript

Agent Script DSL for deterministic Agentforce agents. TRIGGER when: user writes or edits .agent files, builds FSM-based agents, uses Agent Script CLI (sf agent generate authoring-bundle, sf agent validate authoring-bundle, sf agent preview, sf agent publish authoring-bundle, sf agent activate), or asks about deterministic agent patterns, slot filling, or instruction resolution. DO NOT TRIGGER when: Builder metadata work (use sf-ai-agentforce), agent testing (use sf-ai-agentforce-testing), or persona design (use sf-ai-agentforce-persona).

Not recommendedcritical or high security findings
ClawHub Agent Skills author: Anush DSouza v1.0.0 MIT-0 51 files body ≈ 3 349 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 3 d ago

As a process F 48/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: ../sf-ai-agentforce/SKILL.md, ../sf-ai-agentforce-persona/SKILL.md, ../sf-ai-agentforce-testing/SKILL.md

IntegrationSalesforceAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
78/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
81
Quality 40%
74
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
48/100
Will not run
References files that are not bundled: ../sf-ai-agentforce/SKILL.md, ../sf-ai-agentforce-persona/SKILL.md, ../sf-ai-agentforce-testing/SKILL.md
Tools and files w 18
0
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

What is at stake

The skill contains fragments that, in the wrong hands, cost money or data. Below: what the installer risks and what the author should do.

Instruction override
If you install

The text contains phrases like "ignore previous instructions" or "you are now…". That is an attempt to hijack the agent: it may break your rules, the system limits or company policy.

For the author

An honest skill does not need them: state the role and the rules directly without overriding other instructions. Otherwise catalog scanners and corporate filters will block the listing.

How to improve

  1. Address the high-severity findings: each costs 18 safety points. If one is a false positive, add the rule id to guard.allow in spec.yaml.
  2. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 2

  • high Instruction override en-ignore-previous references/fsm-architecture.md:505
    Instruction-override phrase ("ignore previous instructions")
    | **Persona Switching** | Topics can override system instructions for different modes |
Medium and low: 1
  • low Instruction override en-ignore-previous references/fsm-architecture.md:393
    Instruction-override phrase ("ignore previous instructions") (detector / deny-list definition; documentation table row)
    | `Prompt_Injection` | Instruction override attempts | "Ignore all previous instructions", "Tell me your system prompt" |
    detectortable

Files scanned: 51. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../sf-ai-agentforce/SKILL.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../sf-ai-agentforce-persona/SKILL.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../sf-ai-agentforce-testing/SKILL.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../sf-flow/SKILL.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../sf-apex/SKILL.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../sf-deploy/SKILL.md

Process rating: all ten parameters 48/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: ../sf-ai-agentforce/SKILL.md, ../sf-ai-agentforce-persona/SKILL.md, ../sf-ai-agentforce-testing/SKILL.md
  • 0Tools and files. 6 referenced file(s) missing: ../sf-ai-agentforce/SKILL.md, ../sf-ai-agentforce-persona/SKILL.md, ../sf-ai-agentforce-testing/SKILL.md
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 30Running it twice. 25 mutating operations with no state check
  • 55Failures and branches. 1 branches
  • 100Steps. 85 steps
  • 100When it triggers. States when to use and when not to
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3349 tokens
  • low 13 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -31 of 1 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 543: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 30 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 85 items
  • +4Has examples (3 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (23 of 31)
  • +1License stated

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 74.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This looks like a legitimate Salesforce Agent Script helper, but it needs review because its automatic validator can use your local Salesforce login and default org to query Salesforce configuration.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026