SKILLEMALL.ai

CD xiaoyaoclaw-seo-skill

SEO analysis and optimization skill for websites. Use when auditing a site's search visibility, fixing rankings/traffic drops, optimizing pages for Google (Baidu/Bing) and AI search (ChatGPT/Perplexity/AI Overviews). Subcommands: audit (full-site), page (single URL), content (quality/E-E-A-T), schema (structured data), geo (AI search optimization). Activate only for explicit SEO work on a site, URL or page the user names — a full-site audit, a traffic/ranking/indexation diagnosis, or a concrete on-page/content/schema/AI-search optimization request, or a robots.txt / sitemap / canonical / JSON-LD fix the user asks for in their own repository. Do NOT activate for: general questions about SEO concepts ("what is SEO?"), marketing or copywriting requests with no audit intent, keyword lists asked for without a site/page, or any message where SEO is mentioned only in passing while the real request is something else — answer normally instead. 中文:网站搜索可见性分析与优化技能。当用户想优化网站搜索排名、做 SEO 审计、 诊断流量下降/排名消失、优化页面被 AI 搜索引用时使用。子命令:audit(全站审计)、 page(单页分析)、content(内容质量/E-E-A-T)、schema(结构化数据)、geo(AI搜索优化)。 仅当用户**指定了站点/URL/页面**并明确要做 SEO 相关操作时激活(全站体检、流量/排名/ 收录诊断、具体的页面/内容/结构化数据/AI 搜索优化,或要求修自家仓库的 robots.txt、 sitemap、canonical、JSON-LD)。**不激活**的场景:泛问概念("SEO 是什么")、 纯文案营销请求、没给站点的关键词清单、只是顺口提到 SEO 而真实诉求是别的事。 触发词(需与站点/URL 或明确诊断意图同时出现):SEO、SEO审计、技术SEO、全站体检、 排名上不去、流量下降、不被收录、robots.txt、sitemap、canonical、 Core Web Vitals、LCP、H1、meta description、结构化数据、schema、JSON-LD、 富媒体摘要、AI搜索优化、AEO、GEO、llms.txt、E-E-A-T、关键词研究、内链。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: dtsola v1.0.5 MIT-0 14 files · 1 script body ≈ 2 098 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 6 d ago

SEO analysis and optimization skill for websites.

As a process D 40/100 · Unfinished process — References files that are not bundled: assets/examples/robots.txt.template

AnalyzerMarketingtype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
C
80/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
95
Quality 40%
57
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
40/100
Unfinished process
References files that are not bundled: assets/examples/robots.txt.template
Tools and files w 18
0
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

What is at stake

Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.

Broad scope medium severity

Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.

If you install

The skill asks for more than the task needs: broad tool access, credential environment variables, binaries. Every extra permission widens the damage from a mistake or a compromise.

For the author

Narrow allowed-tools and the variable list to the minimum; replace binaries with readable sources or scripts.

How to improve

  1. Shorten the description to 1024 characters.
  2. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 1

✓ No critical or high findings

Medium and low: 1
  • medium Broad scope meta-broad-allowed-tools SKILL.md:1
    Broad tool permissions pre-approved: Bash
    allowed-tools: Read Write Edit Glob Grep Bash WebFetch WebSearch Browser

Files scanned: 14. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • error description-long description is 1496 chars, limit 1024
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: assets/examples/robots.txt.template

Process rating: all ten parameters 40/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: assets/examples/robots.txt.template
  • 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: assets/examples/robots.txt.template
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
  • 100Steps. 77 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2098 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
  • low 11 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Description length 1495: 120–800 characters recommended
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +4No input/output examples
  • -229 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +5Description quotes 2 example trigger phrases
  • +4Structure: 24 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 77 items
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (5 of 5)
  • +3All 1 scripts are documented
  • +1License stated

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 57.

External checks

ClawHub: clean
This skill is a disclosed SEO auditing and optimization helper with bounded public-site fetching and user-confirmed edits, and I found no hidden persistence or unrelated behavior.
LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 28 Sept 2026