BF cqi-special-process
特殊过程 CQI 评估辅助——按 AIAG CQI-9 热处理 / CQI-11 电镀 / CQI-12 涂装 / CQI-15 焊接标准，引导用户逐项提供真实过程信息，生成评估方案→检查表→评分→差距分析→整改计划→再评估的六步闭环文档。适用于过程工程师、质量工程师、审核员，符合 IATF16949 8.5.1.2 特殊过程确认要求。输出 txt+md。
特殊过程 CQI 评估辅助——按 AIAG CQI-9 热处理 / CQI-11 电镀 / CQI-12 涂装 / CQI-15 焊接标准，引导用户逐项提供真实过程信息，生成评估方案→检查表→评分→差距分析→整改计划→再评估的六步闭环文档。适用于过程工程师、质量工程师、审核员，符合 IATF16949…
As a process F 31/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: scripts/build_report.py, references/cqi9_framework.md, references/cqi11_framework.md
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 0. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when") - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: scripts/build_report.py - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/cqi9_framework.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/cqi11_framework.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/cqi12_framework.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/cqi15_framework.md - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "slug" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "displayName"
Process rating: all ten parameters 31/100
- 0Tools and files. 5 referenced file(s) missing: scripts/build_report.py, references/cqi9_framework.md, references/cqi11_framework.md
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (cqi-special-process) differs from the folder (skill-cqi-special-process)
- 100Steps. 31 steps
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 913 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
- low 13 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +4No input/output examples
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 179: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 16 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 31 items
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 54.