SKILLEMALL.ai

AC contract-management

合同管理技能套件:NDA快筛、合同台账提醒、合同对比、审查合同、法条速查、起草合同。 NDA快筛: 帮我看下NDA, 帮我审下保密协议, NDA审查, 保密协议, 保密条款; 合同台账提醒: 合同台账提醒, 合同台账, 到期提醒, 续签管理; 合同对比: 合同对比, 版本差异, 条款变更; 审查合同: 帮我看下这份合同, 帮我审下合同有没有问题, 合同审查, 合同风险, 合同审核; 法条速查: 帮我查个法条, 这个事民法典怎么规定的, 法条检索, 法律依据, 民法典; 起草合同: 帮我起草一份合同, 帮我写个合同模板, 合同起草, 合同模板, 合同条款。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: ebandao v0.1.0 MIT-0 10 files body ≈ 1 194 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

合同管理技能套件:NDA快筛、合同台账提醒、合同对比、审查合同、法条速查、起草合同。 NDA快筛: 帮我看下NDA, 帮我审下保密协议, NDA审查, 保密协议, 保密条款; 合同台账提醒: 合同台账提醒, 合同台账, 到期提醒, 续签管理; 合同对比: 合同对比, 版本差异, 条款变更; 审查合同…

As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureLegaltype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
90/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
76
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
53/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 10. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Steps. 24 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1194 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 280: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 18 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 24 items
  • +4Has examples (2 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (7 of 7)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 76.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This contract-management skill is coherent, but needs Review because it can save or publish sensitive legal documents without clear opt-in and privacy guidance.
LLM: suspicious (high) · 15 Aug 2026