SKILLEMALL.ai

AC corporate-legal

企业法务技能套件:企业背景调查、公司决议、合规审查、查案例、法务日报、法律文书、电子签发起、风险评估。 企业背景调查: 帮我查下这家公司, 帮我做个尽调, 尽职调查, 供应商准入; 公司决议: 公司决议, 股东会决议, 董事会决议, 章程修正案; 合规审查: 合规审查, 个保合规, 数据出境, 广告合规; 查案例: 帮我查个类似案例, 这个情况法院一般怎么判, 裁判文书, 类案检索; 法务日报: 法务日报, 法律速递, 新法速览, 法规更新; 法律文书: 法律文书, 起诉状, 法律意见书; 电子签发起: 电子签发起, 电子合同, 在线签署, 电子签章; 风险评估: 帮我评估下这个风险, 这个交易有什么法律隐患, 诉讼风险, 合规风险。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: ebandao v0.1.0 MIT-0 11 files body ≈ 1 230 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 2 d ago

企业法务技能套件:企业背景调查、公司决议、合规审查、查案例、法务日报、法律文书、电子签发起、风险评估。 企业背景调查: 帮我查下这家公司, 帮我做个尽调, 尽职调查, 供应商准入; 公司决议: 公司决议, 股东会决议, 董事会决议, 章程修正案; 合规审查: 合规审查, 个保合规, 数据出境, 广告合规; 查案例…

As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureSecuritytype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
90/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
76
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
53/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 11. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Steps. 24 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1230 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 321: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 18 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 24 items
  • +4Has examples (2 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (8 of 8)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 76.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This legal-workflow skill is coherent overall but needs Review because it can persist sensitive legal documents and reports to Notion without clear consent, redaction, or retention controls.
LLM: suspicious (high) · 15 Aug 2026