SKILLEMALL.ai

AC corporate-tax

企业财税技能套件:做凭证、内部审计、凭证编制参考、增值税管理、月结检查清单、汇算清缴、财务分析、财务报表编制、预算分析。 做凭证: 帮我做张凭证, 帮我记笔账, 凭证编制, 记账, 会计分录; 内部审计: 内部审计, 内审, 审计底稿, 内控评价; 凭证编制参考: 分录参考, 凭证参考, 会计处理, IFRS; 增值税管理: 增值税管理, 增值税, 进销项, 留抵退税; 月结检查清单: 月末关账, 月结, 关账, 对账; 汇算清缴: 帮我做汇算清缴, 帮我算下所得税, 纳税调整, 汇算清缴; 财务分析: 帮我分析下财务数据, 帮我做个杜邦分析, 比率分析, 财务分析; 财务报表编制: 财务报表编制, 财务报表, 三张表, 合并报表; 预算分析: 预算分析, 预算, 预算执行, 预实对比。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: ebandao v0.1.0 MIT-0 12 files body ≈ 1 256 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

企业财税技能套件:做凭证、内部审计、凭证编制参考、增值税管理、月结检查清单、汇算清缴、财务分析、财务报表编制、预算分析。 做凭证: 帮我做张凭证, 帮我记笔账, 凭证编制, 记账, 会计分录; 内部审计: 内部审计, 内审, 审计底稿, 内控评价; 凭证编制参考: 分录参考, 凭证参考, 会计处理, IFRS…

As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureFinancetype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
90/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
76
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
53/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 12. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Steps. 23 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1256 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 348: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 18 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 23 items
  • +4Has examples (2 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (9 of 9)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 76.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
The skill is coherent for corporate finance and tax work, but it can persist sensitive financial, tax, and audit outputs to Notion without clear per-write consent or destination controls.
LLM: suspicious (medium) · 15 Aug 2026