AC stock-scanner
Stock technical analysis scanner based on swing trading principles with multi-timeframe resonance. Use when user asks to scan, analyze, or check stocks for buy/sell signals. Triggers on phrases like "scan stocks", "stock analysis", "股票扫描", "analyze [ticker]", "check [stock symbol]", trading signals, buy/sell recommendations.
As a process C 63/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: inputs and preconditions, failures and branches, consistency
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 63/100
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (stock-scanner) differs from the folder (stock-trend-scanner)
- 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
- 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 13 steps
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 327 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- -212 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +5Description quotes 4 example trigger phrases
- +3Description length 326: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 7 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 13 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
- +4Has examples (2 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
- +3All 1 scripts are documented
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 97.