SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

DD clawexpert

Domain expert learning system with persistent local knowledge base. READ THIS SKILL FILE at the start of every session — learned topics are stored locally and should be used to answer related questions with source citations instead of relying on parametric memory. Use /clawexpert learn <topic> to build a knowledge base, /clawexpert status to list learned topics, or ask any domain question (check local KB first before answering from training data).

Not recommendedcritical or high security findings · low grade D
ClawHub Agent Skills author: EdgePro001 v1.0.0 MIT-0 22 files · 16 scripts body ≈ 24 166 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 5 d ago

Domain expert learning system with persistent local knowledge base.

As a process D 49/100 · Unfinished process — References files that are not bundled: part-001.md, part-002.md, ../../raw/web/{hash}.md

ReferenceWriting and documentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
D
74/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
82
Quality 40%
61
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
49/100
Unfinished process
References files that are not bundled: part-001.md, part-002.md, ../../raw/web/{hash}.md
Tools and files w 18
0
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

What is at stake

The skill contains fragments that, in the wrong hands, cost money or data. Below: what the installer risks and what the author should do.

Concealment
If you install

The skill tells the agent to hide things from you: not to show errors, not to mention actions, to report differently from what was done. You lose the ability to see what the agent really did.

For the author

Transparency beats a smooth answer. If the goal is to hide technical noise, ask the agent to "summarise briefly", not to "not mention".

How to improve

  1. Address the high-severity findings: each costs 18 safety points. If one is a false positive, add the rule id to guard.allow in spec.yaml.
  2. The SKILL.md body is over 5,000 tokens: move reference detail into references/ and load it when needed.
  3. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 1

  • high Concealment en-hide-from-user SKILL.md:53
    Instruction to hide actions from the user
    **At the beginning of every session**, perform the following check silently (do not inform the user):

Files scanned: 22. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning body-long SKILL.md body ≈ 24166 tokens (recommended < 5000); move details to references/
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: part-001.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: part-002.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../../raw/web/{hash}.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../../raw/pdf/{hash}/_index.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../../raw/pdf/{hash}.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../../raw/pdf/{hash}/part-002.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../raw/web/{hash}.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: nodes/node-001.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: nodes/node-003.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: nodes/node-004.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: nodes/node-002.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: {l1-id}/{l2-label}/_index.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: bretton-woods-system/raw/web/a1b2c3.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: bretton-woods-system/raw/web/d4e5f6.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: bretton-woods-system/nodes/node-001.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: bretton-woods-system/nodes/node-002.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: bretton-woods-system/nodes/node-003.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: bretton-woods-system/nodes/node-004.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: bretton-woods-system/nodes/node-005.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: economics-finance/intl-monetary-history/_index.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: nodes/import-{hash}/node.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../raw/web/xxx.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../raw/web/yyy.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: references/deepdive-subagent-prompt.md
  • note edit-residue the text marks something as outdated (lines 1509): check that old rules are not kept next to new ones — the full check reads the text for contradictions

Process rating: all ten parameters 49/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: part-001.md, part-002.md, ../../raw/web/{hash}.md
  • 0Tools and files. 24 referenced file(s) missing: part-001.md, part-002.md, ../../raw/web/{hash}.md
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 10Execution cost. Instruction body is 24166 tokens: crowds the task out of the window
  • 85Steps. 270 steps, 1 vague phrases
  • 100When it triggers. States when to use and when not to
  • 100Failures and branches. 15 branches, has a failure section
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
  • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
  • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
  • low 16 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
  • high The skill tells the model to perform an irreversible action with no human approval
  • low The response is described with custom markup (17 tags): a typed call is more reliable

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -254 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
  • -31 of 16 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 451: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 76 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 270 items
  • +4Has examples (116 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 61.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
The skill mostly matches its stated research-assistant purpose, but it needs review because it can persistently affect future answers, run broad autonomous research, spawn inherited subagents, silently track topic gaps, and perform unsafe path-based cleanup.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 16 Sept 2026