BF bid-proposal
投标技术方案编写。当用户输入"投标方案##"或"写投标方案"时触发。提供结构化协作式投标方案编写流程：需求分析→大纲推荐→逐章生成→Word输出。适用于安全服务、产品交付、等保测评、综合安全等投标场景。
投标技术方案编写。当用户输入"投标方案"或"写投标方案"时触发。提供结构化协作式投标方案编写流程：需求分析→大纲推荐→逐章生成→Word输出。适用于安全服务、产品交付、等保测评、综合安全等投标场景。
As a process F 35/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: references/default-template.docx
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 1
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 1
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securityskill-card.md:22Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)Risk: Generated proposal language may describe penetration testing, incident response, or operational security work without enough authorization or scope context. <br>
Files scanned: 11. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when") - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/default-template.docx
Process rating: all ten parameters 35/100
Will not run. References files that are not bundled: references/default-template.docx
- 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: references/default-template.docx
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 100Steps. 82 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1408 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
- low 11 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
- low The response is described with custom markup (4 tags): a typed call is more reliable
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Description length 101: 120–800 characters recommended
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -41 reference files, but SKILL.md never points to them: the model will not open them
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +4Structure: 24 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 82 items
- +4Has examples (6 code blocks)
- +3All 3 scripts are documented
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 62.
External checks
ClawHub: clean
This is a coherent bid-proposal writing skill that uses local documents and security-service reference material for its stated purpose, though users should confirm sensitive uploads and treat the security-testing language as proposal text only.
LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 15 Jul 2026