SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AD agent-shield

Scan AI agent skills, MCP servers, and plugins for security vulnerabilities. Use when: user asks to check a skill/plugin for safety, audit security, scan for backdoors/data exfiltration/credential leaks, or evaluate trust of a third-party skill. Triggers: "is this skill safe", "scan for security issues", "audit this plugin", "check for backdoors", "安全扫描", "扫一下安不安全".

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Elliot Liu v0.5.1 MIT-0 2 files body ≈ 607 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 3 d ago

As a process D 39/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

AnalyzerAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
96/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
89
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
39/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 39/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 30Running it twice. 3 mutating operations with no state check
    • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (agent-shield) differs from the folder (agentshield-scanner)
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, python) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 100Steps. 32 steps
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 607 tokens

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +5Description quotes 5 example trigger phrases
    • +3Description length 368: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 5 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 32 items
    • +4Has examples (1 code blocks)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 89.

    External checks

    ClawHub: clean
    This skill is a straightforward security-scanner guide, but it relies on an external npm CLI that users should trust before running.
    LLM: benign (medium) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026