AC slack-thread
Read and summarize Slack channel history and thread conversations. Use when receiving Slack links (https://...slack.com/archives/...) or requests to view channel/thread/reply conversations, summarize discussions, or check recent messages in a channel.
As a process C 57/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: when it triggers, inputs and preconditions, consistency
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 57/100
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 3 mutating operations with no state check
- 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (slack-thread) differs from the folder (slack-reader)
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web) that frontmatter does not declare
- 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
- 100Steps. 34 steps
- 100Failures and branches. 3 branches, has a failure section
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1836 tokens
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 251: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 25 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 34 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
- +4Has examples (8 code blocks)
- +3All 2 scripts are documented
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 90.